Abstract
The observation that the Q people understood themselves as a new symbolic family, with God as Father, is certainly not new in Q studies. Likewise, it is not uncommon for an interpreter to mention during her analysis of an individual Q text that the instruction in question is motivated by imitatio Dei rhetoric. However, the pervasiveness of this link between Q's theology of divine fatherhood and its socio-ethical programme has not received enough attention in Q scholarship. In an attempt to address this deficiency, the current article argues that the idea of divine fatherhood is the primary paradigm that informs, determines and motivates the alternative socio-ethical programme of Q's formative stratum. More than being just an interesting observation in relation to some Q texts, divine fatherhood and imitatio Dei rhetoric are central to the radical socio-ethical programme of Q's formative stratum. After an overview of Q's self-perception as God's symbolic family, the article turns to the analysis of specific texts in Q's formative stratum, first considering the theme of divine fatherhood, and then considering its socio-ethical relevance. These discussions are finally related to the notion of "mutual-mothering," with some implications for our understanding of women in the Q movement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 9-33 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Neotestamentica |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Ethics
- Father
- God
- Imitatio Dei
- Morality
- Q
- Rhetoric
- Sayings Gospel
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious Studies