Yo-yo culture: thinking South Africa after Marikana

Ronit Frenkel, Pamila Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The years following the Marikana massacre were tumultuous ones in South Africa, characterized by corruption scandals, economic downgrades, rising unemployment and increasing resistance to Jacob Zuma’s presidency from South Africans across race, class, regional and political lines. The country’s outlook was pessimistic with dystopian predictions circulating widely as the Zuma regime slowly attempted to erode hard-won democratic processes and poverty skyrocketed. As we write this article, South Africa has once again shifted with the election of Cyril Ramaphosa as president, the removal of Zuma allies from key ministerial posts, the Gupta empire under threat and state capture investigations taking off. The South African cultural imaginary has swiftly shifted again with optimistic narratives emerging and confidence growing amidst the grace and dignity of a new president who once again embodies the liberation movements’ more glorious years after the first elections (despite Ramaphosa’s association with Marikana). This trajectory though is not a new one for South Africa that tends to swing between fear and optimism, pessimism and hope, on a very regular basis. This yo-yo effect is characteristic of the South African cultural imaginary with its consistent peaks and troughs that results in a rather resilient, interesting and highly politicised population despite its differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Dynamics
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • #feesmustfall
  • Marikana
  • Ramaphoria
  • South Africa of the present
  • Zuma presidency
  • cultural imaginary
  • yo-yo culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Yo-yo culture: thinking South Africa after Marikana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this