Abstract
This two-wave study examined work engagement as a function of personal resources and emotionally demanding conditions at work. We hypothesized that personal resources (self-efficacy and optimism) buffer the effect of emotional demands and emotion-rule dissonance on work engagement. Furthermore, we expected that emotional demands/dissonance boost the effect of personal resources on work engagement. One-hundred sixty-three employees, who provide service to customers, participated at both measurement times. Analyses supported (a) the buffering hypothesis, since emotional demands and dissonance related negatively to work engagement when self-efficacy - but not optimism - was low, and (b) the boosting hypothesis, since self-efficacy - but not optimism - related positively to engagement particularly when emotional demands and dissonance were high.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 74-84 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Personnel Psychology |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Emotion-rule dissonance
- Emotional demands
- Personal resources
- Work engagement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management