Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Why We Cannot Separate Evidence From Values in Public Policy

  • Anne Schwenkenbecher
  • , Veli Mitova
  • , Hanna Metzen
  • , Helena Slanickova
  • , Alejandro Bortolus
  • , Emelda E. Chukwu
  • , Remco Heesen
  • , Chad L. Hewitt
  • , Ricardo Kaufer
  • , Hannah Rubin
  • , Mike D. Schneider
  • , Evangelina Schwindt
  • , Temitope O. Sogbanmu
  • , Katie Woolaston
  • , Li an Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Whether or not any particular policy is adequate by EBP's own standard—being evidence-based—cannot be decided without appeal to value-based considerations. We support this claim in two steps. First, we argue that which evidence gets used in policy-making depends on our value commitments, which are rarely made explicit, let alone being the subject of critical and transparent reflection. In other words, value commitments are not just important at the point of spelling out specific policy details and choosing between policy options but they are absolutely essential right from the very beginning of the policy-making process: all the way from deciding which problem should be addressed by policy or regulation to determining which evidence to use and where to look for it. Second, in order to determine when we have enough evidence, we need to take into account relevant value-based considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70109
JournalPolitics and Policy
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • ethics in policy-making
  • evidence selection
  • evidence-based policy
  • inductive risk
  • value-dependence of evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why We Cannot Separate Evidence From Values in Public Policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this