When the chips are down: Social and technical aspects of computer failure and repair

Michael Quayle, Kevin Durrheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores computer failure as a social event by examining recorded interactions between computer users and help-desk consultants (technicians). It was found, first, that the nature of a failure was negotiated between participants rather than being simply technically evident. Failure was defined from users' perspectives, in relation to what they were trying to achieve, rather than according to technical parameters. Secondly, negotiations of failure had social consequences for both users and help-desk consultants. Both avoided being seen as incompetent and actively defended their social standing. Thirdly, such social issues sometimes took precedence over technical and practical ones. The implications for HCI theorists and practitioners are twofold: firstly, failure should be accepted as a regular part of computer use in which human-computer interaction continues even though the interface may be non-functional. Secondly, the management of failure could be better addressed if technicians were trained in social as well as technical intervention skills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1260-1277
Number of pages18
JournalInteracting with Computers
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computer failure
  • Dependable computing
  • HCI
  • Help-desk
  • Human factors
  • Reliability
  • Social aspects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When the chips are down: Social and technical aspects of computer failure and repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this