Abstract
This chapter explores three themes underlying debates on South African universities with respect to responsibility. The first is the dichotomy of the global versus the local in defining university identity and purpose. The second discusses the binary necessities to widen access, and to ensure sustainability, where achieving an appropriate balance often requires hard policy choices to be made. The third theme relates to a responsible curriculum, and here the debates on what should be taught are explored. These range from the need for decolonization, to the need to be more future-focused in preparation for participation in the fourth industrial revolution. The chapter concludes that the application of a consistent set of principles to making the difficult choices, tempered with significant pragmatism, will lead to a responsible higher education sector.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Higher Education |
| Subtitle of host publication | Linking Research, Policy and Practice |
| Publisher | Brill Academic Publishers |
| Pages | 127-140 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Publication series
| Name | Higher Education: Linking Research, Policy and Practice |
|---|---|
| Volume | 1 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2666-7789 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- South Africa
- curriculum
- decolonization
- fourth industrial revolution
- global vs local
- identity
- responsibility
- universities
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Does It Mean to Be a Responsible 21st Century South African University?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver