TY - GEN
T1 - Well posed problems and boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics
AU - Nordström, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - All numerical calculations will fail to provide a reliable answer unless the continuous problem under consideration is well posed. Well-posedness depends in most cases only on the choice of boundary conditions. In this paper we will highlight this fact by discussing well-posedness of the most important set of governing equations in computational fluid dynamics, namely the time-dependent compressible Navier-Stokes equations. In particular, for a simplified model problem of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, we will discuss i) how many boundary conditions are required, ii) where to impose them and iii) which form they should have. The procedure is based on the energy method and generalizes the characteristic boundary procedure for the Euler equations to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Once the boundary conditions in terms of i-iii) are known, one issue remains; they can be imposed weakly or strongly. The differences and similarities between a weak and strong imposition is discussed for the continuous case. It will be shown that the weak and strong boundary procedures produce identical solutions and that the boundary conditions are satisfied exactly also in the weak procedure. We conclude by relating the well-posedness results to energy-stability of the numerical approximation.
AB - All numerical calculations will fail to provide a reliable answer unless the continuous problem under consideration is well posed. Well-posedness depends in most cases only on the choice of boundary conditions. In this paper we will highlight this fact by discussing well-posedness of the most important set of governing equations in computational fluid dynamics, namely the time-dependent compressible Navier-Stokes equations. In particular, for a simplified model problem of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, we will discuss i) how many boundary conditions are required, ii) where to impose them and iii) which form they should have. The procedure is based on the energy method and generalizes the characteristic boundary procedure for the Euler equations to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Once the boundary conditions in terms of i-iii) are known, one issue remains; they can be imposed weakly or strongly. The differences and similarities between a weak and strong imposition is discussed for the continuous case. It will be shown that the weak and strong boundary procedures produce identical solutions and that the boundary conditions are satisfied exactly also in the weak procedure. We conclude by relating the well-posedness results to energy-stability of the numerical approximation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962500365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84962500365
SN - 9781624103667
T3 - 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
BT - 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2015
Y2 - 22 June 2015 through 26 June 2015
ER -