We Are Already Dead. Long May We Live! Death as Event in Koos Prinsloo’s Metropolis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: In this article, I think about death as “event” by reading Koos Prinsloo through the three syntheses of time–Habit, Mnemosyne and Thanatos–as explicated by philosopher Gilles Deleuze in Difference and Repetition, as well as work done with his sometimes co-author, Félix Guattari. I argue that Prinsloo’s oeuvre provides a critical and clinical function that can provide methods for releasing jouissance so that the death drive can be re-directed. Thus, whereas the critical function engages literary figures, styles and ways of being, as well as Kant’s understanding of critique, the clinical provides a symptomatology of life potentiality in a given work. Together, these function to identify the genesis of life as a creative force and, in so doing, restores healthy living.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-142
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Literary Studies
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'We Are Already Dead. Long May We Live! Death as Event in Koos Prinsloo’s Metropolis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this