Abstract
Debates on communication media and democracy including in Africa are largely anchored in the western Habermasian public sphere concept. Studies employing indigenous African communication platforms and symbols are scarce, prompting Zimbabwean philosopher Tafataona Mahoso to argue that while Africans have a philosophy, we have become ‘illiterate’ such that we cannot read our constructions and symbols. Thus, this article broadens discussions on participatory communication practices and democratic principles by engaging pre-colonial Zimbabwe communication and solidarity relational philosophies of Dariro and Dare (ubiquitous circle) largely located in traditional Shona societies. The philosophical democratic dimensions of these platforms are discussed in relation to Habermas’ public sphere theory. We show that despite western thought generally regarding the non-West as a place of antiquarian traditions and unprocessed data, pre-colonial indigenous African communication systems were characterized by democratic participation, agency and public contest; at times beyond democratic practices and principles espoused by the Habermasian public sphere.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 35-50 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of African Media Studies |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |
Keywords
- Dare
- Dariro
- Participatory communication
- Public sphere
- Shona society
- Zimbabwe
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication