TY - JOUR
T1 - Voting Decisions and Racialized Fluidity in South Africa's Metropolitan Municipalities
AU - Paret, Marcel
AU - Runciman, Carin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society.
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - Do racial identities determine voting behaviour in post-apartheid South Africa- To address this question, we draw from a representative sample of 3,905 registered voters in five metropolitan municipalities: Johannesburg, Tshwane, Durban, Cape Town, and Nelson Mandela Bay. Our findings are mixed. On the one hand, Black voters were significantly more likely to vote for the African National Congress, whereas Coloured, Indian, and especially white voters were more likely to vote for the Democratic Alliance. This contrast comes into particular focus when we examine how voters acted over the course of a three-election period. On the other hand, race was far from a guaranteed predictor, not the least because many chose to abstain from voting - a trend that extended, though unevenly, to all racial groups. Importantly, though, the electorate did not split between party loyalists and consistent abstainers. Instead, fluidity predominated: About half of the electorate changed positions between elections, either by switching between parties or between voting and abstaining. Our findings thus demonstrate what we call 'racialized fluidity': Many voters are changing their voting decision from one election to the next, but in the aggregate, racial identity remains correlated with voting decisions.
AB - Do racial identities determine voting behaviour in post-apartheid South Africa- To address this question, we draw from a representative sample of 3,905 registered voters in five metropolitan municipalities: Johannesburg, Tshwane, Durban, Cape Town, and Nelson Mandela Bay. Our findings are mixed. On the one hand, Black voters were significantly more likely to vote for the African National Congress, whereas Coloured, Indian, and especially white voters were more likely to vote for the Democratic Alliance. This contrast comes into particular focus when we examine how voters acted over the course of a three-election period. On the other hand, race was far from a guaranteed predictor, not the least because many chose to abstain from voting - a trend that extended, though unevenly, to all racial groups. Importantly, though, the electorate did not split between party loyalists and consistent abstainers. Instead, fluidity predominated: About half of the electorate changed positions between elections, either by switching between parties or between voting and abstaining. Our findings thus demonstrate what we call 'racialized fluidity': Many voters are changing their voting decision from one election to the next, but in the aggregate, racial identity remains correlated with voting decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162212996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/afraf/adad010
DO - 10.1093/afraf/adad010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162212996
SN - 0001-9909
VL - 122
SP - 269
EP - 298
JO - African Affairs
JF - African Affairs
IS - 487
ER -