TY - JOUR
T1 - Very Low-Level Transcranial Photobiomodulation . for Major Depressive Disorder
T2 - The ELATED-3 Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
AU - Iosifescu, Dan V.
AU - Norton, Richard J.
AU - Tural, Umit
AU - Mischoulon, David
AU - Collins, Katherine
AU - McDonald, Erin
AU - De Taboada, Luis
AU - Foster, Simmie
AU - Cusin, Cristina
AU - Yeung, Albert
AU - Clain, Alisabet
AU - Schoenfeld, David
AU - Hamblin, Michael R.
AU - Cassano, Paolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: Transcranial photobiomodulation (t-PBM) with near-infrared (NIR) light might represent a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the dosimetry of administered t-PBM varies widely. We tested the efficacy of t-PBM with low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions in individuals with MDD. Methods: A 2-site, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted of adjunct t-PBM NIR (830 nm; continuous wave; 35.8 cm2 treatment area; 54.8 mW/cm2 irradiance; 65.8 J/cm2 fluence, 20 min/session; ~2 W total power; 2.3 kJ total energy per session), delivered to the prefrontal cortex, bilaterally, twice a week for 6 weeks, in subjects diagnosed with MDD per the DSM-IV criteria. Subjects were recruited between August 2016 and May 2018. A sequential parallel comparison design was used: 18 nonresponders to sham in phase 1 (6 weeks) were re-randomized in phase 2. The primary outcome was reduction in depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS-17] and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Clinician Rating [QIDS-C] scores) from baseline. Statistical analyses used R package SPCDAnalyze2, including all subjects with ≥ 1 post-randomization evaluation. Results: Of the 54 subjects recruited, we included 49 MDD subjects in the analysis (71% female, mean ± SD age 40.8 ± 16.1 years). There were no significant differences between t-PBM and sham with respect to the change in HDRS-17 (t= −0.319, P= .751) or QIDS-C (t= −0.499, P= .620) scores. The sham effect was reasonably low. Conclusions: Mostly uncontrolled studies suggest the efficacy of t-PBM for MDD; however, its optimal dose is still to be defined. A minimal dose threshold is likely necessary, similarly to other neuromodulation techniques in MDD (electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation). We established a threshold of inefficacy of t-PBM for MDD, based on combined low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions.
AB - Background: Transcranial photobiomodulation (t-PBM) with near-infrared (NIR) light might represent a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the dosimetry of administered t-PBM varies widely. We tested the efficacy of t-PBM with low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions in individuals with MDD. Methods: A 2-site, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted of adjunct t-PBM NIR (830 nm; continuous wave; 35.8 cm2 treatment area; 54.8 mW/cm2 irradiance; 65.8 J/cm2 fluence, 20 min/session; ~2 W total power; 2.3 kJ total energy per session), delivered to the prefrontal cortex, bilaterally, twice a week for 6 weeks, in subjects diagnosed with MDD per the DSM-IV criteria. Subjects were recruited between August 2016 and May 2018. A sequential parallel comparison design was used: 18 nonresponders to sham in phase 1 (6 weeks) were re-randomized in phase 2. The primary outcome was reduction in depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS-17] and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Clinician Rating [QIDS-C] scores) from baseline. Statistical analyses used R package SPCDAnalyze2, including all subjects with ≥ 1 post-randomization evaluation. Results: Of the 54 subjects recruited, we included 49 MDD subjects in the analysis (71% female, mean ± SD age 40.8 ± 16.1 years). There were no significant differences between t-PBM and sham with respect to the change in HDRS-17 (t= −0.319, P= .751) or QIDS-C (t= −0.499, P= .620) scores. The sham effect was reasonably low. Conclusions: Mostly uncontrolled studies suggest the efficacy of t-PBM for MDD; however, its optimal dose is still to be defined. A minimal dose threshold is likely necessary, similarly to other neuromodulation techniques in MDD (electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation). We established a threshold of inefficacy of t-PBM for MDD, based on combined low irradiance, low energy per session, and low number of sessions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136339566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.21m14226
DO - 10.4088/JCP.21m14226
M3 - Article
C2 - 35950904
AN - SCOPUS:85136339566
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 83
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 5
M1 - 21m14226
ER -