Abstract
Supposing some legal solutions lay in exploring and understanding the substantive content of ubuntu, what then? Is there no ground for suspecting that some legal scholars and courts, in so far as they have been dogmatists, have failed to understand ubuntu? That the terrible, seriousness and clumsy importunity with which they have usually paid their addresses to ubuntu have been unskilled and unseemly methods of solving some legal problems? Certainly, some legal problems have not rendered themselves to proper solutions through such methods.1
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 239-251 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | South African Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jun 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ubuntu and the law in South Africa: Exploring and understanding the substantive content of ubuntu'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver