Trustworthiness and truth: The epistemic pitfalls of internet accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since anonymous agents can spread misinformation with impunity, many people advocate for greater accountability for internet speech. This paper provides a veritistic argument that accountability mechanisms can cause significant epistemic problems for internet encyclopedias and social media communities. I show that accountability mechanisms can undermine both the dissemination of true beliefs and the detection of error. Drawing on social psychology and behavioral economics, I suggest alternative mechanisms for increasing the trustworthiness of internet communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-81
Number of pages19
JournalEpisteme
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trustworthiness and truth: The epistemic pitfalls of internet accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this