Transcending the quantitativequalitative divide with mixed methods research: A multidimensional framework for understanding congruence and completeness in the study of values

Charles L. McLafferty, John R. Slate, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantitative research dominates published literature in the helping professions. Mixed methods research, which integrates quantitative and qualitative methodologies, has received a lukewarm reception. The authors address the iterative separation that infuses theory, praxis, philosophy, methodology, training, and public perception and propose a dimensional viewpoint as a framework for successful Integration of mixed methods research. This dimensional perspective demonstrates that mixed methods research techniques are necessary but not sufficient to study spiritual, ethical, and religious value issues. Research of career development, "best practices," nature-nurture, and prayer illustrate weaknesses and opportunities for evaluating dimensional mixed methods approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-62
Number of pages17
JournalCounseling and Values
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Religious Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcending the quantitativequalitative divide with mixed methods research: A multidimensional framework for understanding congruence and completeness in the study of values'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this