Abstract
In this commentary, I respond to Ilies, Aw & Pluut’s (Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here?, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, in press) call for a theory that distinguishes between traits and states of employee well-being. I use Job Demands–Resources theory to illustrate how we may integrate within- and between-person approaches and findings to design an overall multilevel model of employee well-being. My perspective builds on Ilies et al. and recent findings of research combining relatively stable “traits” with fluctuating states of employee well-being. My goals with this commentary are three-fold: (1) give more insight into possible differences between variables at different levels of analysis; (2) use research to show how trait and state levels of (predictors of) employee well-being may interact; (3) propose a multilevel model that may stimulate future research on the topic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 839-843 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2 Nov 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- affective events
- diary studies
- employee well-being
- job demands–resources theory
- work engagement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management