To be done with the possible, to no longer possibilate: Considering the masochist as the figure of exhaustion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Coldness and Cruelty, Deleuze remarks that masochism may be reflected on from three perspectives: as a pleasure–pain alliance, as an enactment of humiliation and slavery, and as a consideration of the enslavement of contractual relations. Later Deleuze and Guattari consider masochism in terms of an ontology of desire – in terms of virtuality rather than extensity. I argue that while the actualisation of pain might be considered secondary, and is oftentimes portrayed as incidental in popular depictions, it also constitutes the exhaustive/exhausted and refrain functions of masochism so that the masochist might be thought of as the figure of exhaustion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-206
Number of pages21
JournalDeleuze and Guattari Studies
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fatigue
  • Figure of exhaustion
  • Masochistic pain
  • Possible experience
  • Real experience
  • Refrain function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To be done with the possible, to no longer possibilate: Considering the masochist as the figure of exhaustion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this