Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity

  • Jasmine R. Lee
  • , Aleks Terauds
  • , Josie Carwardine
  • , Justine D. Shaw
  • , Richard A. Fuller
  • , Hugh P. Possingham
  • , Steven L. Chown
  • , Peter Convey
  • , Neil Gilbert
  • , Kevin A. Hughes
  • , Ewan McIvor
  • , Sharon A. Robinson
  • , Yan Ropert-Couder
  • , Dana M. Bergstrom
  • , Elisabeth M. Biersma
  • , Claire Christian
  • , Don A. Cowan
  • , Yves Frenot
  • , Stephanie Jenouvrier
  • , Lisa Kelley
  • Michael J. Lee, Heather J. Lynch, Birgit Njåstad, Antonio Quesada, Ricardo M. Roura, E. Ashley Shaw, Damon Stanwell-Smit, Megumu Tsujimoto, Diana H. Wall, Annick Wilmotte, Iadine Chadès
  • University of Queensland
  • CSIRO
  • Monash University
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • Australian Antarctic Division
  • The Nature Conservancy
  • University of Wollongong
  • CNRS UMR 7372
  • University of Johannesburg
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition
  • University of Pretoria
  • Université de Rennes
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators
  • Reel Time Gaming
  • Stony Brook University
  • Norwegian Polar Institute
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • University of Oregon
  • Viking Expeditions
  • Keio University
  • Research Organization of Information and Systems, National Institute of Polar Research
  • Colorado State University
  • University of Liege

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day equivalent annual cost of US$23 million, could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa. Climate change is identified as the most pervasive threat to Antarctic biodiversity and influencing global policy to effectively limit climate change is the most beneficial conservation strategy. However, minimising impacts of human activities and improved planning and management of new infrastructure projects are cost-effective and will help to minimise regional threats. Simultaneous global and regional efforts are critical to secure Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere3001921
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land
  4. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • General Immunology and Microbiology
  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this