Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Thermal and Hydraulic Performances of Carbon and Metallic Oxides-Based Nanomaterials

  • Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan
  • , Mohammed Suleman Aldlemy
  • , Ali M. Ahmed
  • , Ali H. Jawad
  • , Maryam H. Naser
  • , Raad Z. Homod
  • , Zainab Haider Mussa
  • , Adnan Hashim Abdulkadhim
  • , Miklas Scholz
  • , Zaher Mundher Yaseen
  • Al-Maarif University College
  • College of Mechanical Engineering Technology
  • Center for Solar Energy Research and Studies (CSERS)
  • Al-Esraa University College
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Al-Mustaqbal University College
  • Basra Univirsity of Oil and Gas
  • University of Al-Ameed
  • Al-Ayen University
  • Lund University
  • Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences
  • South Ural State University
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • University of Southern Queensland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For companies, notably in the realms of energy and power supply, the essential requirement for highly efficient thermal transport solutions has become a serious concern. Current research highlighted the use of metallic oxides and carbon-based nanofluids as heat transfer fluids. This work examined two carbon forms (PEG@GNPs & PEG@TGr) and two types of metallic oxides (Al2O3 & SiO2) in a square heated pipe in the mass fraction of 0.1 wt.%. Laboratory conditions were as follows: 6401 ≤ Re ≤ 11,907 and wall heat flux = 11,205 W/m2. The effective thermal–physical and heat transfer properties were assessed for fully developed turbulent fluid flow at 20–60 °C. The thermal and hydraulic performances of nanofluids were rated in terms of pumping power, performance index (PI), and performance evaluation criteria (PEC). The heat transfer coefficients of the nanofluids improved the most: PEG@GNPs = 44.4%, PEG@TGr = 41.2%, Al2O3 = 22.5%, and SiO2 = 24%. Meanwhile, the highest augmentation in the Nu of the nanofluids was as follows: PEG@GNPs = 35%, PEG@TGr = 30.1%, Al2O3 = 20.6%, and SiO2 = 21.9%. The pressure loss and friction factor increased the highest, by 20.8–23.7% and 3.57–3.85%, respectively. In the end, the general performance of nanofluids has shown that they would be a good alternative to the traditional working fluids in heat transfer requests.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1545
JournalNanomaterials
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2022

Keywords

  • carbon nanostructures
  • convective heat transfer
  • metallic oxides
  • thermophysical properties
  • turbulent flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemical Engineering
  • General Materials Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thermal and Hydraulic Performances of Carbon and Metallic Oxides-Based Nanomaterials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this