Abstract
In 2013, the World Health Organization recognised the systematic neglect of mental health across the world. This chapter considers the question in light of the general context of sustainable development goals 3. It suggests that the manner in which it was drafted implies that a more objective construction of wellbeing is intended. The chapter discusses a central problem with subjective accounts of wellbeing and focuses on the implications of this discussion for those with psychosocial disabilities. It highlights the importance of considering what is meant by wellbeing and the adoption of a balanced approach that both recognises the importance of the subjective experience, choice and preferences of individuals, as well as objective factors in that regard. Once individuals have been recognised to have a psychosocial disability, their subjective preferences and autonomy have often been disregarded.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Routledge Handbook of International Development, Mental Health and Wellbeing |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 291-304 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000001174 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780367027735 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Health Professions
- General Medicine
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The sustainable development goals, psychosocial disability, and the meaning of wellbeing in SDG3: Towards an approach that combines the subjective and objective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver