The state of South Africa’s public–private partnership practices in transport projects: Problems and potential

Background: Despite growing calls for public–private partnerships (PPPs) to supplemendiminishing investment in South Africa’s transport sector, the uptake of transport PPPs in the country was low over the past 15 years compared with Brazil, Russia, India and Chinwhich performed well in this regard. This low uptake poses several consequences in light othe positive correlation between transport capital investment and economic growth. Objectives: The study aimed to describe the problems faced in the South African PPP processfirstly by comparing and contrasting PPP practices of South Africa to its counterparts in the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) multilateral forum in view ounderstanding the reasons for the low uptake of transport PPPs in the country and, secondlyby interviewing transport PPP experts on their opinions on constraints and possible solutionfor PPPs in the country. Method: In light of the limited research on transport PPPs in South Africa, as well as the low level of PPP implementation, secondary data analysis was followed by an exploratory qualitative research design used to obtain rich data from subject experts on the topic at hand. Results: The main findings reveal that the politicisation of infrastructure through party politics, political risk and domination of the state in the delivery of strategic infrastructurcontributes to the low uptake of PPPs. Conclusion: A need exists to strengthen political commitment for PPPs by centralising and coordinating planning across different tiers of government, while easing the regulatory burden, making them simpler to implement and more attractive to investors and promoting inclusivity. Policymakers can utilise these findings to improve areas of practice requiring intervention.