Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The spatial structure of antarctic biodiversity

  • Peter Convey
  • , Steven L. Chown
  • , Andrew Clarke
  • , David K.A. Barnes
  • , Stef Bokhorst
  • , Vonda Cummings
  • , Hugh W. Ducklow
  • , Francesco Frati
  • , T. G.Allan Green
  • , Shulamit Gordon
  • , Huw J. Griffiths
  • , Clive Howard-Williams
  • , Ad H.L. Huiskes
  • , Johanna Laybourn-Parry
  • , W. Berry Lyons
  • , Andrew McMinn
  • , Simon A. Morley
  • , Lloyd S. Peck
  • , Antonio Quesada
  • , Sharon A. Robinson
  • Stefano Schiaparelli, Diana H. Wall
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • University of Malaya
  • Monash University
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • NIWA
  • Columbia University
  • University of Siena
  • University of Waikato
  • Antarctica New Zealand
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research - NIOZ
  • University of Bristol
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Tasmania
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • University of Wollongong
  • University of Genoa
  • Colorado State University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

332 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patterns of environmental spatial structure lie at the heart of the most fundamental and familiar patterns of diversity on Earth. Antarctica contains some of the strongest environmental gradients on the planet and therefore provides an ideal study ground to test hypotheses on the relevance of environmental variability for biodiversity. To answer the pivotal question, ''How does spatial variation in physical and biological environmental properties across the Antarctic drive biodiversity?'' we have synthesized current knowledge on environmental variability across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine Antarctic biomes and related this to the observed biotic patterns. The most important physical driver of Antarctic terrestrial communities is the availability of liquid water, itself driven by solar irradiance intensity. Patterns of biota distribution are further strongly influenced by the historical development of any given location or region, and by geographical barriers. In freshwater ecosystems, free water is also crucial, with further important influences from salinity, nutrient availability, oxygenation, and characteristics of ice cover and extent. In the marine biome there does not appear to be one major driving force, with the exception of the oceanographic boundary of the Polar Front. At smaller spatial scales, ice cover, ice scour, and salinity gradients are clearly important determinants of diversity at habitat and community level. Stochastic and extreme events remain an important driving force in all environments, particularly in the context of local extinction and colonization or recolonization, as well as that of temporal environmental variability. Our synthesis demonstrates that the Antarctic continent and surrounding oceans provide an ideal study ground to develop new biogeographical models, including life history and physiological traits, and to address questions regarding biological responses to environmental variability and change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-244
Number of pages42
JournalEcological Monographs
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Biogeography
  • Environmental gradients
  • Historical contingency
  • Marine
  • Spatial scale and variation
  • Terrestrial environments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The spatial structure of antarctic biodiversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this