The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map

Ruth Stewart; Yvonne Erasmus; Hazel Zaranyika; Natalie Rebelo Da Silva; Marcel Korth; Laurenz Langer; Nicola Randall; Nolizwe Madinga; Thea de Wet

doi:10.1080/19439342.2013.877060

The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map

Ruth Stewart, Yvonne Erasmus, Hazel Zaranyika, Natalie Rebelo Da Silva, Marcel Korth, Laurenz Langer, Nicola Randall, Nolizwe Madinga, Thea de Wet

Africa Centre for Evidence

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relevant systematic reviews and impact evaluations were systematically sought and described in order to assess the size and nature of the evidence-base about the effectiveness of interventions for smallholder farmers in Africa. A total of 21 relevant systematic reviews and 415 reports of impact evaluations were identified. This paper describes this African evidence-base in terms of the interventions and outcomes assessed, and the geographical spread of the primary research across the continent. Gaps in the evidence-base are identified and recommendations made for future research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	58-68
Number of pages	11
Journal	Journal of Development Effectiveness
Volume	6
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2013.877060
Publication status	Published - Jan 2014

Keywords

Africa
evidence
food security
income
innovation
smallholder farming
training
yield

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Development

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1080/19439342.2013.877060

Cite this

@article{33b9a2d0443a44a19ae3776216a79e0a,

title = "The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map",

abstract = "Relevant systematic reviews and impact evaluations were systematically sought and described in order to assess the size and nature of the evidence-base about the effectiveness of interventions for smallholder farmers in Africa. A total of 21 relevant systematic reviews and 415 reports of impact evaluations were identified. This paper describes this African evidence-base in terms of the interventions and outcomes assessed, and the geographical spread of the primary research across the continent. Gaps in the evidence-base are identified and recommendations made for future research.",

keywords = "Africa, evidence, food security, income, innovation, smallholder farming, training, yield",

author = "Ruth Stewart and Yvonne Erasmus and Hazel Zaranyika and \{Rebelo Da Silva\}, Natalie and Marcel Korth and Laurenz Langer and Nicola Randall and Nolizwe Madinga and \{de Wet\}, Thea",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1080/19439342.2013.877060",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "58--68",

journal = "Journal of Development Effectiveness",

issn = "1943-9342",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa

T2 - a systematic map

AU - Stewart, Ruth

AU - Erasmus, Yvonne

AU - Zaranyika, Hazel

AU - Rebelo Da Silva, Natalie

AU - Korth, Marcel

AU - Langer, Laurenz

AU - Randall, Nicola

AU - Madinga, Nolizwe

AU - de Wet, Thea

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Relevant systematic reviews and impact evaluations were systematically sought and described in order to assess the size and nature of the evidence-base about the effectiveness of interventions for smallholder farmers in Africa. A total of 21 relevant systematic reviews and 415 reports of impact evaluations were identified. This paper describes this African evidence-base in terms of the interventions and outcomes assessed, and the geographical spread of the primary research across the continent. Gaps in the evidence-base are identified and recommendations made for future research.

AB - Relevant systematic reviews and impact evaluations were systematically sought and described in order to assess the size and nature of the evidence-base about the effectiveness of interventions for smallholder farmers in Africa. A total of 21 relevant systematic reviews and 415 reports of impact evaluations were identified. This paper describes this African evidence-base in terms of the interventions and outcomes assessed, and the geographical spread of the primary research across the continent. Gaps in the evidence-base are identified and recommendations made for future research.

KW - Africa

KW - evidence

KW - food security

KW - income

KW - innovation

KW - smallholder farming

KW - training

KW - yield

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897055831

U2 - 10.1080/19439342.2013.877060

DO - 10.1080/19439342.2013.877060

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897055831

SN - 1943-9342

VL - 6

SP - 58

EP - 68

JO - Journal of Development Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Development Effectiveness

IS - 1

ER -

The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this