Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Rejection of the Voice for Aboriginal People in Australia – A Postmortem of Causes of Failure

  • State Administrative Tribunal of Western Australia
  • Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On 14 October 2023, the Australian electorate rejected by an overwhelming majority a proposal for a constitutionally guaranteed advisory body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. This was the fourth attempt in Australia to create an advisory voice for Aboriginal people, but the first time it was attempted via a constitutional amendment involving a public vote. The rejection is continuing to reverberate through Australian society. To many Aboriginal people this was not only a rejection of a technical proposal, but a rejection of their aspirations of self-determination. This article reflects on some of the root causes why in the view of the author, the referendum failed. The article is critical of the lack of information about the composition and functions of the proposed Voice as well as the inconsistencies between various reports and public documents. These contributed to public scepticism and rejection of the proposal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-306
Number of pages41
JournalConstitutional Review
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Advisory Body
  • Australia
  • Indigenous Rights
  • Referendum
  • Self-Determination
  • The Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Rejection of the Voice for Aboriginal People in Australia – A Postmortem of Causes of Failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this