Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Problems with Language Policy and Planning

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article begins with a critique of dominant approaches to language policy in education that are based on the notion of “rights” and “peoples.” It makes the case for an approach that is based on the tripartite view of social justice, as articulated by Nancy Fraser. This view of social justice sees a complementary relationship between the politics of recognition, distribution and representation. The study on which the article is based demonstrates how the experience of using a second language can be analysed with these dimensions in mind. The study is based on the biographical, educational narratives of a group of academics who recount experiences of learning and using a second language at the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. The study was conducted during a time of intense concern with the language policy of the university. It suggests that if language policies or plans are needed, these should be based upon principles of social justice and the needs of people rather than on the needs of reified languages or the rights of peoples.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)36-49
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Language, Identity and Education
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

    Keywords

    • South Africa
    • higher education
    • identity
    • language ideology
    • language planning
    • language policy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Problems with Language Policy and Planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this