The Interrater Reliability of Subjective Assessments of the Babinski Reflex

Chloe Dafkin, Andrew Green, Samantha Kerr, Demetri Veliotes, Benita Olivier, Warrick McKinon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Babinski reflex is a clinical diagnostic tool; however, the interrater reliability of this tool is currently greatly contested. A comparison between rater groups with objective measurements of the Babinski reflex was therefore conducted. Fifteen recorded Babinski reflexes were assessed by 12 neurologists and 12 medical students as being either pathological or nonpathological. Kinematic and electromyographic variables were collected and used to assess which aspects of the Babinski reflex predict classification. Substantial interrater agreement within the neurologist and student groups ( =.72 and.67, respectively) was shown; however, there were some differing aspects between what neurologists and students used to assess the reflex as determined by objective kinematic measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-121
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Babinski reflex
  • electromyography
  • hallux
  • kinematics
  • subjective rating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Interrater Reliability of Subjective Assessments of the Babinski Reflex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this