The 'good', the 'bad' and the 'ugly'? views on male teachers in foundation phase education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of the foundation phase, where women tend to dominate, the increasing numbers of male students entering teaching programmes for this phase of schooling has generated considerable praise, as well as criticism. This paper explores the views of two first-year foundation phase (FP) student cohorts at a Johannesburg university about male teachers in the FP. Student responses to two open-ended questions formed the data for this study, with qualitative content analysis procedures used to make sense thereof. Findings indicate an uncomfortable tension between the 'good,' the 'bad', and the 'ugly' in student perspectives of male teachers in the FP, where the 'good' is reflected in recognition of the valuable role of males in countering the effects of absentee fathers; the 'bad' in the various reasons provided for male's unsuitability as teachers of young children; and the 'ugly' in the dominant association of males with the perception of a threat of sexual abuse and molestation, much of which is attributed to increased media coverage and public awareness of abuse in schools. The paper concludes with a discussion of the ramifications hereof for teacher education and for the profession.

Original languageEnglish
Article number772
JournalSouth African Journal of Education
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Foundation phase teaching
  • Male teachers
  • Pre-service teacher recruitment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 'good', the 'bad' and the 'ugly'? views on male teachers in foundation phase education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this