The first residue analysis blind tests: Results and lessons learnt

Lyn Wadley, Marlize Lombard, Bonny Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty-eight stone flakes were produced, sterilised and then used for a variety of tasks involving the processing of plants and animal products. Precautions were taken to avoid contaminating the residues. One set of used flakes was stored in sealed plastic bags; the other set was buried in compost for a month and then exposed to open-air conditions for three days. The bagged tools were used for a blind test (Test One) to assess the identification skills of the residue analyst who was not provided with any information prior to conducting the analysis. She obtained a high score for recognition of residues and tasks performed. Test Two used the tools that had been buried in compost and here the aim was to study the effects of acidic, organic-rich deposits on plant and animal residues. The Test Two results intimate that animal residues are more sensitive to certain burial and exposed conditions than plant residues, but more closely controlled experiments are needed before definite conclusions can be drawn.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1491-1501
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blind test
  • Replication studies
  • Residue analysis
  • Residue preservation
  • Stone tools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archeology (arts and humanities)
  • Archeology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The first residue analysis blind tests: Results and lessons learnt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this