Abstract
In this chapter, Karen Frost-Arnold provides a close analysis of the epistemological challenges posed by context collapse in online environments and argues that virtue epistemology provides a helpful normative framework for addressing some of these problems. “Context collapse” is the blurring or merging of multiple contexts or audiences into one. Frost-Arnold identifies at least three epistemic challenges posed by context collapse. First, context collapse facilitates online harassment, which causes epistemic harm by decreasing the diversity of epistemic communities. Second, context collapse threatens the integrity of marginalized epistemic communities in which some types of true beliefs flourish. Third, context collapse promotes misunderstanding, as understanding relies on background knowledge which, in turn, is often context sensitive. Frost-Arnold then argues that we can cultivate and promote the epistemic virtues of trustworthiness and discretion in order to address some of these problems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Applied Epistemology |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 437-455 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780198833659 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Context collapse
- Discretion
- Diversity
- Epistemic virtues
- Marginalized epistemic communities
- Online environments
- Online harassment
- Trustworthiness
- Understanding
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Epistemic Dangers of Context Collapse Online'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver