TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficient recyclable molybdenum-and tungsten-promoted mesoporous ZrO2 catalysts for aminolysis of epoxides
AU - Hlatshwayo, Xolani Sibusiso
AU - Xaba, Morena S.
AU - Ndolomingo, Matumuene Joe
AU - Bingwa, Ndzondelelo
AU - Meijboom, Reinout
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In the present study, we report the synthesis and catalytic activity of tungsten-and molybdenum-promoted mesoporous metal oxides in the aminolysis of epoxides. The as-synthesized catalysts were fully characterized by a variety of techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and desorption (TPD), nitrogen sorption measurements, powder X-ray diffraction (p-XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Amongst the two supports utilized, ZrO2 is a better support compared to SiO2. Furthermore, MoO3 proved to be a better dopant compared to its counterpart. Several parameters such as the variation of solvents, substrates, catalyst amounts, and stirring speed were investigated. It was observed that 450 rpm was the optimum stirring speed, with toluene as the best solvent and styrene oxide as the best substrate. Moreover, the optimum parameters afforded 98% conversion with 95% selectivity towards 2-phenyl-2-(phenylamino) ethanol and 5% towards 1-phenyl-2-(phenylamino) ethanol. Furthermore, 5%MoO3-ZrO2 catalyst demonstrated optimal performance and it exhibited excellent activity as well as great stability after being recycled 6 times.
AB - In the present study, we report the synthesis and catalytic activity of tungsten-and molybdenum-promoted mesoporous metal oxides in the aminolysis of epoxides. The as-synthesized catalysts were fully characterized by a variety of techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and desorption (TPD), nitrogen sorption measurements, powder X-ray diffraction (p-XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Amongst the two supports utilized, ZrO2 is a better support compared to SiO2. Furthermore, MoO3 proved to be a better dopant compared to its counterpart. Several parameters such as the variation of solvents, substrates, catalyst amounts, and stirring speed were investigated. It was observed that 450 rpm was the optimum stirring speed, with toluene as the best solvent and styrene oxide as the best substrate. Moreover, the optimum parameters afforded 98% conversion with 95% selectivity towards 2-phenyl-2-(phenylamino) ethanol and 5% towards 1-phenyl-2-(phenylamino) ethanol. Furthermore, 5%MoO3-ZrO2 catalyst demonstrated optimal performance and it exhibited excellent activity as well as great stability after being recycled 6 times.
KW - Aminolysis of epoxides
KW - Heterogeneous catalysis
KW - Inverse micelle
KW - Mesoporous zirconium oxide
KW - Molybdenum
KW - Selectivity
KW - Tungsten
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106432293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/catal11060673
DO - 10.3390/catal11060673
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106432293
SN - 2073-4344
VL - 11
JO - Catalysts
JF - Catalysts
IS - 6
M1 - 673
ER -