The effect of conditioning with NaCL, KCL and HCL on the performance of natural clinoptilolites removal efficiency of cu2+ and co2+ from Co/Cu synthetic solutions

B. B. Mamba, D. W. Nyembe, A. F. Mulaba-Bafubiandi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Southern African clinoptilolites capability as an ion-exchanger with respect to Cu2+and Co2+was investigated in order to consider its viability in the removal of metal cations from aqueous solutions. The effect of chemical conditioning was investigated using sodium chloride (NaCl), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and potassium chloride (KCl). The most efficient activating or conditioning reagent was found to be HCl at 0.02 M concentration, followed by KCl at 0.04 M and then NaCl at 0.04 M. The worst performing clinoptilolite was the original form under the conditions described in this study and it thus served as a control. The HCl-conditioned clinoptilolite was the most efficient in metal removal (79% Co2+and 73% Cu2+) followed by the NaCl-conditioned form (69% Co2+ and 54% Cu2+), while the KCl-conditioned form adsorbed 54% and 73% of Co2+and Cu2+, respectively. The column method was used for the cation-exchange processes with synthetic solutions of 0.0020 M, 0.0698 M and 0.2000 M of Co2+and Cu2+ concentrations which were measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-444
Number of pages8
JournalWater S.A.
Volume36
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Chemical conditioning
  • Clinoptilolite
  • Copper and cobalt
  • Ion-exchange

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of conditioning with NaCL, KCL and HCL on the performance of natural clinoptilolites removal efficiency of cu2+ and co2+ from Co/Cu synthetic solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this