The age and palaeomagnetism of Jurassic dykes, western Dronning Maud Land: implications for Gondwana breakup

M. A. Morake, J. N.F. O’kennedy, M. W. Knoper, M. de Kock, J. D. Kramers, G. H. Grantham, G. Belyanin, M. A. Elburg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New40 Ar/39 Ar data from dykes intruded into Sverdrupfjella and Ahlmanryggen, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, indicate that dyke emplacement commenced at c. 207 Ma and lasted until c. 178 Ma. Whereas the ages ascribed to the Karoo-age magmatism contributing to Gondwana breakup are typically inferred as being c. 182 Ma, the data indicate that ages older than c.192 Ma in the broader Karoo Province are restricted to western Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, indicating the locality where breakup was initiated. Limited palaeomagnetic data from c. 178–185 Ma dykes combined with published palaeomagnetic data from similar-aged dykes in Vestfjella and the Ferrar Province, suggest that Antarctica had already drifted/rifted significantly away from southern Africa from c. 207 to c. 180 Ma, earlier than previously thought. The data, if correct, require a re-evaluation of the ages ascribed to ocean-floor anomalies used to constrain reconstructions of Gondwana and may provide insight into the history of microcontinental blocks including the Falkland Islands, Haag nunataks, Ellsworth–Whitmore block and Maurice Ewing Bank.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGeological Society Special Publication
PublisherGeological Society of London
Pages255-284
Number of pages30
Edition1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Publication series

NameGeological Society Special Publication
Number1
Volume518
ISSN (Print)0305-8719

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The age and palaeomagnetism of Jurassic dykes, western Dronning Maud Land: implications for Gondwana breakup'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this