Technology or taphonomy? A study of the 2.04–1.95 Ma bone tools from Drimolen Main Quarry, South Africa

Rhiannon C. Stammers, Justin W. Adams, Stephanie E. Baker, Andy I.R. Herries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysis of 124 rounded fossils, potential bone tools, from the 2.04–1.95 Ma early hominin-bearing Drimolen Main Quarry palaeocave deposits in South Africa were subject to comparative analysis of fossil and bone collections with known taphonomic accumulator/s, actualistic experiments, and comparative analysis relative to published data in the taphonomic literature. From this sample, 51 specimens were identified as bone tools. The inclusion of these specimens raises the number of bone tools identified at Drimolen Main Quarry to 65. The bone tools have a rounded tip and an associated use-wear pattern that is restricted to, and radiates from, this rounded tip. Diaphyseal fragments were the most common raw material selected for tool use. We hypothesise that the raw material was collected from both carnivore kill and natural death sites. The striation patterns, identified though visual comparisons, present on the bone tools comprise parallel, subparallel and diagonal striations which suggests that the tools may have had a multi-use application. The place of bone technology within the South African Earlier Stone Age is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-33
Number of pages14
JournalQuaternary International
Volume665-666
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Bone tools
  • Drimolen Main Quarry
  • Earlier stone age
  • Homo erectus
  • Paranthropus robustus
  • South african early homo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technology or taphonomy? A study of the 2.04–1.95 Ma bone tools from Drimolen Main Quarry, South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this