Abstract
The beliefs teachers have about assessment influence classroom practices and reflect cultural and societal differences. This paper reports the development of a new self-report inventory to examine beliefs teachers in Hong Kong and southern China contexts have about the nature and purpose of assessment. A statistically equivalent model for Hong Kong and southern China teachers had three factors (i.e., improvement, accountability, and irrelevance). The Chinese teachers very strongly associated accountability with improvement (r = .80). This is consistent with the Chinese tradition and policy of using examinations to drive teaching quality and student learning and as a force for merit based decisions. Small differences between the two groups of teachers are consistent with assessment policy differences in the two jurisdictions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 307-320 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | International Journal of Educational Research |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Attitudes
- Beliefs
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- Educational assessment
- Multi-group invariance testing
- Survey research
- Teachers
- Values
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Teachers' conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver