Supervisor perspectives in STEM PhD supervision: a social realist analysis of current trends

Alan S. Cornell, Wesley Doorsamy, Kershree Padayachee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The traditional academic pipeline has branched out significantly in recent years. The motivation of students pursuing higher degrees has also changed dramatically in response to wider socio-economic needs. Supervisors of PhD students are consequently faced with the need to adapt supervision practices to equip graduates with a broader suite of workplace competencies. However, PhD supervision is a practice located in the broader setting of a higher education system, conditioned by factors that change over time. In this paper we share the perspectives of a range of STEM supervisors from varying backgrounds on their conceptions of the purpose and goals of the PhD. Archer’s Social Realist theoretical framework was used in a comparative analysis between groups and across themes. It also enabled a novel visualisation in the form of a heat map, illustrating the mechanisms shaping supervision practices, highlighting the strong interplay between student agency and the development of particular dispositions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-159
Number of pages14
JournalHigher Education Pedagogies
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Social realism
  • constraints
  • dispositions
  • motivations
  • time-to-completion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supervisor perspectives in STEM PhD supervision: a social realist analysis of current trends'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this