TY - JOUR
T1 - Struggle for the sands of Xolobeni – From post-colonial environmental injustice to crisis of democracy
AU - Healy, Hali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - In resource-rich South Africa, natural resource extraction has been fundamental to processes of primitive accumulation, forming the bedrock of the national economy. Accordingly, struggles for control over land and resources have been constant throughout this nation's history. The coastal sands of Xolobeni on South Africa's Wild Coast, where Australia's Mineral Commodities (MRC) and its South African subsidiary Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) Ltd. has set its sights on a wealth of titanium and other minerals, is home to one such struggle. Taking an approach of narrative enquiry, this article applies an analytic lens of post-colonial environmental injustice to show how the State has colluded with corporate powers to sacrifice marginal black South African communities upon an altar of development defined by extractivism and dominated by global capitalism. Its analysis reveals the captured South African state as the leading agent of “slow violence”, and argues that this conflict is indicative of a larger crisis of democracy. It also questions how communities who oppose mining and favour alternative forms of development, can successfully defend land and livelihoods. Reflecting on an ongoing court battle with Shell over seismic testing off the Wild Coast, the article concludes that the State cannot be depended upon to protect the interests of rural communities, or to deliver societal transformation, let alone decolonisation. The onus instead lies with the strength of civil society, backed up by the protective powers of an independent South African judiciary.
AB - In resource-rich South Africa, natural resource extraction has been fundamental to processes of primitive accumulation, forming the bedrock of the national economy. Accordingly, struggles for control over land and resources have been constant throughout this nation's history. The coastal sands of Xolobeni on South Africa's Wild Coast, where Australia's Mineral Commodities (MRC) and its South African subsidiary Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) Ltd. has set its sights on a wealth of titanium and other minerals, is home to one such struggle. Taking an approach of narrative enquiry, this article applies an analytic lens of post-colonial environmental injustice to show how the State has colluded with corporate powers to sacrifice marginal black South African communities upon an altar of development defined by extractivism and dominated by global capitalism. Its analysis reveals the captured South African state as the leading agent of “slow violence”, and argues that this conflict is indicative of a larger crisis of democracy. It also questions how communities who oppose mining and favour alternative forms of development, can successfully defend land and livelihoods. Reflecting on an ongoing court battle with Shell over seismic testing off the Wild Coast, the article concludes that the State cannot be depended upon to protect the interests of rural communities, or to deliver societal transformation, let alone decolonisation. The onus instead lies with the strength of civil society, backed up by the protective powers of an independent South African judiciary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131122120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131122120
SN - 0016-7185
VL - 133
SP - 128
EP - 139
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
ER -