Abstract
This article argues that the external history of South African English (SAfE) points towards the merits of conceptualizing SAfE as the product of a three-stage koinéization process, the last stage of which takes place contemporaneously with the establishment of Johannesburg. This is at odds with the standard position, which views SAfE as an early-to-mid 19th-century variety with its characteristic features having been fixed during the earlier colonization of the Cape and Natal. This reconceptualization is, in turn, usefully employed to solve Trudgill's (2004) so-called "South African puzzle": in essence, the postulation of SAfE as a late 19th-century English explains why START-Backing has occurred in SAfE but not in the closely related Australasian varieties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 127-146 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | English World-Wide |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- 19th-century English
- BATH vowel
- Dialect contact
- Extraterritorial Englishes
- Johannesburg
- Koinéization
- New-dialect formation
- South African English
- STARTBacking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language