Social (in)justices during the educator developmental appraisal process: A post-apartheid South African case study

Venie Perumalsamy, Juliet Perumal, Parvathy Naidoo, Naiema Taliep

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Globally, the appraisal of educators remains a contested issue as the process, which aims to provide support and development to educators, is generally considered a punitive measure for educators. Within the South African context, the Integrated Quality Management System is used to evaluate educators. Drawing on Fraser’s theories of social justice, this article explores the perspectives of 11 educators regarding educator developmental appraisal in post-apartheid South Africa as a catalyst for social (in)justice. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using critical discourse analysis. This article highlights the importance of social justice practices in enhancing learner achievement and foregrounds the (in)justices often witnessed during the appraisal process. Findings reveal that the developmental appraisal process has the potential to promote social justice; however, contextual factors seem to be hindering the successful implementation of the appraisal process.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEducation, Citizenship and Social Justice
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • educator developmental appraisal
  • educators’ perspectives
  • Integrated Quality Management System
  • social justice
  • South Africa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social (in)justices during the educator developmental appraisal process: A post-apartheid South African case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this