Processing factors affecting the phytochemical and nutritional properties of pomegranate (punica granatum L.) peel waste: A review

Tandokazi Pamela Magangana, Nokwanda Pearl Makunga, Olaniyi Amos Fawole, Umezuruike Linus Opara

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pomegranate peel has substantial amounts of phenolic compounds, such as hydrolysable tannins (punicalin, punicalagin, ellagic acid, and gallic acid), flavonoids (anthocyanins and catechins), and nutrients, which are responsible for its biological activity. However, during processing, the level of peel compounds can be significantly altered depending on the peel processing technique used, for example, ranging from 38.6 to 50.3 mg/g for punicalagins. This review focuses on the influence of postharvest processing factors on the pharmacological, phytochemical, and nutritional properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel. Various peel drying strategies (sun drying, microwave drying, vacuum drying, and oven drying) and different extraction protocols (solvent, super-critical fluid, ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, and pressurized liquid extractions) that are used to recover phytochemical compounds of the pomegranate peel are described. A total phenolic content of 40.8 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g DM was recorded when sun drying was used, but the recovery of the total phenolic content was higher at 264.3 mg TAE/g when pressurised liquid extraction was performed. However, pressurised liquid extraction is costly due to the high initial investment costs and the limited possibility of carrying out selective extractions of organic compounds from complex peel samples. The effects of these methods on the phytochemical profiles of pomegranate peel extracts are also influenced by the cultivar and conditions used, making it difficult to determine best practice. For example, oven drying at 60 C resulted in higher levels of punicalin of 888.04 mg CE/kg DM compared to those obtained 40 C of 768.11 mg CE/kg DM for the Wonderful cultivar. Processes that are easy to set up, cost-effective, and do not compromise the quality and safety aspects of the peel are, thus, more desirable. From the literature survey, we identified a lack of studies testing pretreatment protocols that may result in a lower loss of the valuable biological compounds of pomegranate peels to allow for full exploitation of their health-promoting properties in potentially new value-added products.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4690
JournalMolecules
Volume25
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Agriculture waste
  • Antioxidant activity
  • Horticultural processing
  • Pomegranate peel
  • Postharvest physiology
  • Total phenolic content
  • Value addition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chemistry (miscellaneous)
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Drug Discovery
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Processing factors affecting the phytochemical and nutritional properties of pomegranate (punica granatum L.) peel waste: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this