TY - JOUR
T1 - Possible Clinical Implications of Geographic Differences in Prevalence of Double Transverse Foramen
AU - Sanchis-Gimeno, Juan A.
AU - Quiles-Guiñau, Laura
AU - Llido-Torrent, Susanna
AU - Aparicio, Luis
AU - Nalla, Shahed
AU - Miquel-Feutch, Marcos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Background: The double transverse foramen (DBLTF) is a cervical spine anatomic variant. Current literature has presented prevalence values of DBLTF in Caucasian Mediterranean subjects that seem to be higher than those observed in other samples of subjects. Therefore we aimed to test if Caucasian Mediterranean subjects present a higher prevalence of the DBLTF than sub-Saharan African subjects. Methods: We analyzed the presence of DBLTF in cervical spines of 100 skeletons from Caucasian Mediterranean subjects and 91 skeletons from sub-Saharan African subjects, resulting in a total of 1337 cervical vertebrae having been studied. Results: No DBLTF was found in vertebrae C1, C2, and C3. The pattern of prevalence observed in all samples analyzed indicated the prevalence ranged from exhibiting the most to the least prevalence as C6 > C5 > C7 > C4. The sub-Saharan African subjects presented a significant reduced DBLTF prevalence of 2.2%, 14.3%, 19.8%, and 3.3% in C4 (P = 0.043), C5 (P = 0.004), C6 (P < 0.001), and C7 (P = 0.041), respectively, than that presented by Caucasian Mediterranean subjects (9.0%, 32.0%, 45.0%, 11.0% in C4, C5, C6, and C7, respectively). Conclusions: Our study has revealed that this anatomic variation is more frequently found in Caucasian Mediterranean subjects than in sub-Saharan African subjects.
AB - Background: The double transverse foramen (DBLTF) is a cervical spine anatomic variant. Current literature has presented prevalence values of DBLTF in Caucasian Mediterranean subjects that seem to be higher than those observed in other samples of subjects. Therefore we aimed to test if Caucasian Mediterranean subjects present a higher prevalence of the DBLTF than sub-Saharan African subjects. Methods: We analyzed the presence of DBLTF in cervical spines of 100 skeletons from Caucasian Mediterranean subjects and 91 skeletons from sub-Saharan African subjects, resulting in a total of 1337 cervical vertebrae having been studied. Results: No DBLTF was found in vertebrae C1, C2, and C3. The pattern of prevalence observed in all samples analyzed indicated the prevalence ranged from exhibiting the most to the least prevalence as C6 > C5 > C7 > C4. The sub-Saharan African subjects presented a significant reduced DBLTF prevalence of 2.2%, 14.3%, 19.8%, and 3.3% in C4 (P = 0.043), C5 (P = 0.004), C6 (P < 0.001), and C7 (P = 0.041), respectively, than that presented by Caucasian Mediterranean subjects (9.0%, 32.0%, 45.0%, 11.0% in C4, C5, C6, and C7, respectively). Conclusions: Our study has revealed that this anatomic variation is more frequently found in Caucasian Mediterranean subjects than in sub-Saharan African subjects.
KW - Anatomic variations
KW - Clinical symptoms
KW - Geographical variations
KW - Spine
KW - Transverse foramen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063284650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.096
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.096
M3 - Article
C2 - 30831296
AN - SCOPUS:85063284650
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 126
SP - e570-e572
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -