Abstract
This article challenges the prevailing orthodoxy in the South African literature on participation in development, which suggests that it is government structures alone that determine citizen participation in development. It focuses on the empirical example of the Alexandra Vukuzenzele Crisis Committee (AVCC), an affiliate of the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF), to show the ways in which agents shape and recreate development practices on the Alexandra Renewal Project (ARP), an African National Congress flagship programme. To do this, the article draws from interviews with stakeholders involved in the ARP as well as the AVCC who seek to contest the allocation of houses in the ARP. Following Cornwall (2004), this article argues that agents can force the government to concede to their demands despite the government's structures which initially appeared to exclude them.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 436-449 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Social Dynamics |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Participatory development
- Participatory governance
- Social movements
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Participatory spaces and the Alexandra Vukuzenzele Crisis Committee (AVCC): Reshaping government plans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver