TY - JOUR
T1 - Mycokey round table discussions of future directions in research on chemical detection methods, genetics and biodiversity of mycotoxins
AU - Leslie, John F.
AU - Lattanzio, Veronica
AU - Audenaert, Kris
AU - Battilani, Paola
AU - Cary, Jeffrey
AU - Chulze, Sofia N.
AU - De Saeger, Sarah
AU - Gerardino, Annamaria
AU - Karlovsky, Petr
AU - Liao, Yu Cai
AU - Maragos, Chris M.
AU - Meca, Giuseppe
AU - Medina, Angel
AU - Moretti, Antonio
AU - Munkvold, Gary
AU - Mulè, Giuseppina
AU - Njobeh, Patrick
AU - Pecorelli, Ivan
AU - Perrone, Giancarlo
AU - Pietri, Amedeo
AU - Palazzini, Juan M.
AU - Proctor, Robert H.
AU - Rahayu, Endang S.
AU - Ramírez, Maria L.
AU - Samson, Robert
AU - Stroka, Jörg
AU - Sulyok, Michael
AU - Sumarah, Mark
AU - Waalwijk, Cees
AU - Zhang, Qi
AU - Zhang, Hao
AU - Logrieco, Antonio F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - MycoKey, an EU-funded Horizon 2020 project, includes a series of “Roundtable Discussions” to gather information on trending research areas in the field of mycotoxicology. This paper includes summaries of the Roundtable Discussions on Chemical Detection and Monitoring of mycotoxins and on the role of genetics and biodiversity in mycotoxin production. Discussions were managed by using the nominal group discussion technique, which generates numerous ideas and provides a ranking for those identified as the most important. Four questions were posed for each research area, as well as two questions that were common to both discussions. Test kits, usually antibody based, were one major focus of the discussions at the Chemical Detection and Monitoring roundtable because of their many favorable features, e.g., cost, speed and ease of use. The second area of focus for this roundtable was multi-mycotoxin detection protocols and the challenges still to be met to enable these protocols to become methods of choice for regulated mycotoxins. For the genetic and biodiversity group, both the depth and the breadth of trending research areas were notable. For some areas, e.g., microbiome studies, the suggested research questions were primarily of a descriptive nature. In other areas, multiple experimental approaches, e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics, RNAi and gene deletions, are needed to understand the regulation of toxin production and mechanisms underlying successful biological controls. Answers to the research questions will provide starting points for developing acceptable prevention and remediation processes. Forging a partnership between scientists and appropriately-placed communications experts was recognized by both groups as an essential step to communicating risks, while retaining overall confidence in the safety of the food supply and the integrity of the food production chain.
AB - MycoKey, an EU-funded Horizon 2020 project, includes a series of “Roundtable Discussions” to gather information on trending research areas in the field of mycotoxicology. This paper includes summaries of the Roundtable Discussions on Chemical Detection and Monitoring of mycotoxins and on the role of genetics and biodiversity in mycotoxin production. Discussions were managed by using the nominal group discussion technique, which generates numerous ideas and provides a ranking for those identified as the most important. Four questions were posed for each research area, as well as two questions that were common to both discussions. Test kits, usually antibody based, were one major focus of the discussions at the Chemical Detection and Monitoring roundtable because of their many favorable features, e.g., cost, speed and ease of use. The second area of focus for this roundtable was multi-mycotoxin detection protocols and the challenges still to be met to enable these protocols to become methods of choice for regulated mycotoxins. For the genetic and biodiversity group, both the depth and the breadth of trending research areas were notable. For some areas, e.g., microbiome studies, the suggested research questions were primarily of a descriptive nature. In other areas, multiple experimental approaches, e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics, RNAi and gene deletions, are needed to understand the regulation of toxin production and mechanisms underlying successful biological controls. Answers to the research questions will provide starting points for developing acceptable prevention and remediation processes. Forging a partnership between scientists and appropriately-placed communications experts was recognized by both groups as an essential step to communicating risks, while retaining overall confidence in the safety of the food supply and the integrity of the food production chain.
KW - Antibodies
KW - Biological control
KW - Communication with non-scientists
KW - Metabolomics
KW - Microbiome
KW - Multi-mycotoxin detection protocols
KW - Nominal group discussion technique
KW - Proteomics
KW - Transcriptomics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043383359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/toxins10030109
DO - 10.3390/toxins10030109
M3 - Article
C2 - 29494529
AN - SCOPUS:85043383359
SN - 2072-6651
VL - 10
JO - Toxins
JF - Toxins
IS - 3
M1 - 109
ER -