TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling constructed wetlands
T2 - Scopes and aims - a comparative review
AU - Meyer, Daniel
AU - Chazarenc, Florent
AU - Claveau-Mallet, Dominique
AU - Dittmer, Ulrich
AU - Forquet, Nicolas
AU - Molle, Pascal
AU - Morvannou, Ania
AU - Pálfy, Tamás
AU - Petitjean, Alain
AU - Rizzo, Anacleto
AU - Samsó Campà, Roger
AU - Scholz, Miklas
AU - Soric, Audrey
AU - Langergraber, Günter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - During the last two decades a couple of models were developed for constructed wetlands with differing purposes. Meanwhile the usage of this kind of tool is generally accepted, but the misuse of the models still confirms the skepticism. Generally some groups of models can be distinguished: on one hand mechanistic models try to display the complex and diffuse interaction of occurring processes, on the other hand the same kind of models are used to investigate single processes. New kinds of 'simplified' approaches - well appreciated by engineers - try to display system performances without going to deep into details. All types of models are valuable - some more for scientific usage, others more for engineering. The given summary tries to support potential users in taking the right choice in model selection. Big differences can be found in the model availabilities. Whereas some of the compared software packages are purchasable without limitation, some others are only accessible on their platform level, and some can be seen as exclusive property. From the experience of the authors it can be summarized, that research groups starting modelling/simulation studies should be encouraged to use the given knowledge before starting from scratch again.
AB - During the last two decades a couple of models were developed for constructed wetlands with differing purposes. Meanwhile the usage of this kind of tool is generally accepted, but the misuse of the models still confirms the skepticism. Generally some groups of models can be distinguished: on one hand mechanistic models try to display the complex and diffuse interaction of occurring processes, on the other hand the same kind of models are used to investigate single processes. New kinds of 'simplified' approaches - well appreciated by engineers - try to display system performances without going to deep into details. All types of models are valuable - some more for scientific usage, others more for engineering. The given summary tries to support potential users in taking the right choice in model selection. Big differences can be found in the model availabilities. Whereas some of the compared software packages are purchasable without limitation, some others are only accessible on their platform level, and some can be seen as exclusive property. From the experience of the authors it can be summarized, that research groups starting modelling/simulation studies should be encouraged to use the given knowledge before starting from scratch again.
KW - Comparison
KW - Constructed wetlands
KW - Model
KW - Modelling
KW - Review
KW - Simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930045733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.031
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.031
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930045733
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 80
SP - 205
EP - 213
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
ER -