Abstract
Tracing the acquisition of knapping skill in the Acheulian technocomplex is complicated by incomplete records of lithic production. Some studies have turned attention to examining knapping errors as a means of identifying signatures of toolmaking expertise in the deep past. Such insights have recently been applied to handaxes from the Area 1 spring eye at Amanzi Springs, which have suggested this locality functioned as a Large Cutting Tool workshop. Here we extend our analysis to handaxes from the Surfaces 2/3 (∼530–480 ka), Surface 1, and Cutting 5 (<480–408 ka) excavation areas within the Area 2 spring eye, which focuses on the development and frequency of step and hinge fractures and the management of cross-sectional shape. We identify differences in both the flaking strategies and the mitigation of knapping errors that demonstrate a gradual adaptation to local quartzite raw material and the acquisition of technological skill through time.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 347-363 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Lithic Technology |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Acheulian
- Amanzi Springs
- Technological skill
- handaxes
- knapping errors
- quartzite
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Archeology (arts and humanities)
- Anthropology
- Archeology