Abstract
This article builds a case for raising occupational consciousness by critically questioning ahistorical and apolitical uses of battle language, especially when referring to infectious diseases. Words such as invasion, colonization, and resistance are particularly ethically troubling, and this article considers why the social practices our language brings about matter in health care. Dynamic relationships among humans and microbes, as well as metaphor, are considered here in historical context and through the lens of Derrida’s portmanteau hostipitality, which invites reconsideration of an infectious disease notion of host and how conceptions of hospitality have been institutionalized and commodified. This article argues that language used in infectious disease care settings should be informed by coexistence as a guiding value of clinical and ethical relevance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E390-E398 |
| Journal | AMA Journal of Ethics |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2024 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
- Health (social science)
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'MEDICINE AND SOCIETY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Why We Need to Change How We Talk About Infectious Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver