Abstract
In taking the notions of dynamicity and change seriously, this article offers a critical, albeit partial, examination of the status quo of liberation theologies in South Africa. To that end, this article provided a background to our thinking on how and why the current discourse on liberation theologies must be challenged to embrace alternative liberative ways of thinking and being that exist outside of academia and, consequently, outside a liberative paradigm largely defined by academic liberation theologians. This article argued that interpreting the current liberationist conversation through Vincent Lloyd’s concepts of domination and dignity – drawing on the black struggle – provides a valuable framework for understanding what constitutes liberation and liberation theology beyond the prescriptive academic discourses bound to a specific set of ideological lenses and practices. In other words, this article contends that a stronger framework for interlocution and praxis emerges when infused with dignity. This infusion allows both concepts to be understood primarily as grounded rather than dictated. In practice, this article proposes that this shift would enable academic liberation theologians to engage with new and diverse voices and knowledge outside the confines of academia in a less authoritative manner.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | a10558 |
| Journal | HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- South Africa
- academic hegemony
- dignity
- domination
- interlocution
- liberation theologies
- praxis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Liberating liberation theologies in post-apartheid South Africa: New directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver