Leadership and discursive mobilizing of collective action in the Jonestown mass killing

Kevin Durrheim, Leda Blackwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We study a transcript of discourse recorded on an open mic during the mass suicide/murder of 909 members of a religious community in Jonestown in 1978. The ‘Jonestown massacre’ is often cited in psychology textbooks as a warning example of how powerful situations and charismatic leaders can lead ordinary people to extreme and destructive behaviours. These accounts suggest that individuals lose control of reason and will such that their behaviour becomes subject to outside control. We develop an alternative explanation of the mass killing as identity-based collective action. Our analysis shows how a shared understanding of the community's situation and the options available to them were constructed and contested in discourse. We demonstrate how Jim Jones served as impresario, entrepreneur and champion of identity, recognizing his followers' agency, initiating collective meaning-making and mobilizing action. Jones engaged his followers in jointly constructing the situation as hopeless, developing a shared view of their situated social identity and collectively formulating the identity-congruent solution of collective suicide as a hopeful act of collective agency. Our analysis points to the importance of addressing the conditions that sustain narratives of collective hopelessness and helping groups successfully choose non-extremist pathways out of hopelessness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2121-2134
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • collective action
  • discourse
  • leadership
  • social identity
  • social influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership and discursive mobilizing of collective action in the Jonestown mass killing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this