TY - JOUR
T1 - Judging the twelve tribes of Israel
T2 - Q 22:28, 30 in light of the psalms of solomon and the community rule
AU - Howes, Llewellyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014. The Authors.
PY - 2014/9/30
Y1 - 2014/9/30
N2 - The current article considers two intertexts of Q 22:28, 30, namely the Psalms of Solomon and the Community Rule found in the first Qumran cave. Each of these documents is examined to understand its view of the restoration of Israel, the messianic age, the apocalyptic end and the final judgement. Additional attention is paid to the way in which these documents draw boundaries around their respective in-groups. By illustrating that these texts foresaw a process of judgement at the apocalyptic end that would entail both the liberation and the condemnation of greater Israel, the current article argues against the popular claim that a wholesale liberation of everyone in Israel was expected during the Second-Temple period. The broader context of this investigation is the attempted refutation of Horsley’s influential claim that, in Q 22:28-30, the verb actually means ‘liberate’ and not ‘judge’. Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: By illustrating that these texts foresaw a process of judgement at the apocalyptic end that would entail both the liberation and the condemnation of greater Israel, the current article argues against the popular claim that a wholesale liberation of everyone in Israel was expected during the Second-Temple period.
AB - The current article considers two intertexts of Q 22:28, 30, namely the Psalms of Solomon and the Community Rule found in the first Qumran cave. Each of these documents is examined to understand its view of the restoration of Israel, the messianic age, the apocalyptic end and the final judgement. Additional attention is paid to the way in which these documents draw boundaries around their respective in-groups. By illustrating that these texts foresaw a process of judgement at the apocalyptic end that would entail both the liberation and the condemnation of greater Israel, the current article argues against the popular claim that a wholesale liberation of everyone in Israel was expected during the Second-Temple period. The broader context of this investigation is the attempted refutation of Horsley’s influential claim that, in Q 22:28-30, the verb actually means ‘liberate’ and not ‘judge’. Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: By illustrating that these texts foresaw a process of judgement at the apocalyptic end that would entail both the liberation and the condemnation of greater Israel, the current article argues against the popular claim that a wholesale liberation of everyone in Israel was expected during the Second-Temple period.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979642564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4102/ve.v35i1.1320
DO - 10.4102/ve.v35i1.1320
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84979642564
SN - 1609-9982
VL - 35
JO - Verbum et Ecclesia
JF - Verbum et Ecclesia
IS - 1
M1 - 1320
ER -