Is It the Natural Rate Hypothesis or the Hysteresis Hypothesis for Unemployment Rates in Newly Industrialized Economies?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The focus of our study is on determining whether unemployment rates in 8 New Industrialized Economies conform to the natural rate hypothesis or the hysteresis hypothesis. To this end, we employ a variety of unit of unit root testing procedures to quarterly data collected between 2002:q1 and 2017:q1. Summarizing of our findings, conventional unit root tests which account neither for asymmetries nor structural breaks produce the most inconclusive results. On the other hand, tests which incorporate structural breaks while ignoring asymmetries tends to favour the natural rate hypothesis for our panel of countries. However, simultaneously accounting for asymmetries and unobserved structural breaks seemingly produces the most robust findings and confirms hysteresis in all unemployment rates except for Asian economies/countries of Thailand and the Philippines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-55
Number of pages17
JournalComparative Economic Research
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fourier function approximation
  • hysteresis hypothesis
  • natural rate hypothesis
  • newly industrialized economies
  • unemployment
  • unit root tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Economics,Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is It the Natural Rate Hypothesis or the Hysteresis Hypothesis for Unemployment Rates in Newly Industrialized Economies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this