Involvement in research without compromising research quality

Kristin Liabo, Ruth Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health research funders in the UK now ask applicants to state how their research will involve patients and members of the public. Such involvement can help with questions that researchers repeatedly face: about improving trial recruitment, response rates and follow-up. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in research is usually presented in the form of a ladder, from a low rung where studies are led by researchers with no patient involvement, to a high rung where studies are patient-led. This hierarchy does not sit well with many clinicians and academics whose expertise appears to have been downgraded. This article argues that research quality and relevance are optimised when patient expertise is integrated with researchers' and policy-makers' expertise, and each role acknowledged and valued, illustrated by an alternative model for PPI which places research and expertise at the centre of the involvement enterprise.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-251
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Health Services Research and Policy
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Involvement in research without compromising research quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this