TY - GEN
T1 - Investigating ensemble weight and the certainty distributions for indicating structural diversity
AU - Masisi, Lesedi Melton
AU - Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo
AU - Marwala, Tshilidzi
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - In this paper an investigation of the distribution of the weights and the biases of the Multilayered Perceptron is conducted, in particular the variance of the weight vector (weights and biases) with the aim of indicating the existence of the structural diversity within the ensemble. This will indicate how well the weight vector samples are distributed from the mean and this will be used to serve as an indicator of the structural diversity of the classifiers within the ensemble. This is inspired by the fact that many measures of ensemble diversity are focused on the outcomes and not the classifier's structure and hence may lose out in diversity measures that correlate well with ensemble performance. Three ensembles were compared, one non-diverse and the other two ensembles made diverse. The generalization across all the ensembles was approximately the same (74 % accuracy). This could be attributed to the data used. Certainty measures were also conducted and indicated that the non-diverse ensemble was biased, even though the performance across the ensembles was the same.
AB - In this paper an investigation of the distribution of the weights and the biases of the Multilayered Perceptron is conducted, in particular the variance of the weight vector (weights and biases) with the aim of indicating the existence of the structural diversity within the ensemble. This will indicate how well the weight vector samples are distributed from the mean and this will be used to serve as an indicator of the structural diversity of the classifiers within the ensemble. This is inspired by the fact that many measures of ensemble diversity are focused on the outcomes and not the classifier's structure and hence may lose out in diversity measures that correlate well with ensemble performance. Three ensembles were compared, one non-diverse and the other two ensembles made diverse. The generalization across all the ensembles was approximately the same (74 % accuracy). This could be attributed to the data used. Certainty measures were also conducted and indicated that the non-diverse ensemble was biased, even though the performance across the ensembles was the same.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349103340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-03040-6_63
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-03040-6_63
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70349103340
SN - 3642030394
SN - 9783642030390
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 517
EP - 524
BT - Advances in Neuro-Information Processing - 15th International Conference, ICONIP 2008, Revised Selected Papers
T2 - 15th International Conference on Neuro-Information Processing, ICONIP 2008
Y2 - 25 November 2008 through 28 November 2008
ER -